IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 205 Bulley State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in accordance with Government Policies (Annexures P instructions from Mr. Charan Singh Rana, Executive Engineer, PD (B&R), Gurugram that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the claim of the petitioner has been accepted and the petitioner has regularized w.e.f. 01.10.2003 and thereafter, the petitioner has now been retired. adjourned either on request or due to non counsel for the petition CWP-15901-2001 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15901 of 2001 (O & M) Date of decision : Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana assisted by Mr. Charan Singh Rana, Executive Engineer, PD (B&R), Gurugram. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuing directions to the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in accordance with Government Policies (Annexures P-2 and P Today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Mr. Charan Singh Rana, Executive Engineer, PD (B&R), Gurugram that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the claim of the petitioner has been accepted and the petitioner has regularized w.e.f. 01.10.2003 and thereafter, the petitioner has now been Heard. The order sheets shows that the matter has been repeatedly adjourned either on request or due to non-appearance on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner i.e. on 30.8.2022, 19.9.2022, 11.10.2022, 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15901 of 2001 (O & M) Date of decision :-06.07.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana assisted by Mr. Charan Singh Rana, Executive Engineer, PD-1, PWD writ petition is for issuing directions to the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in accordance 2 and P-3 respectively). Today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. ted by learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Mr. Charan Singh Rana, Executive Engineer, PD-1, PWD (B&R), Gurugram that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the claim of the petitioner has been accepted and the petitioner has been regularized w.e.f. 01.10.2003 and thereafter, the petitioner has now been The order sheets shows that the matter has been repeatedly appearance on behalf of learned er i.e. on 30.8.2022, 19.9.2022, 11.10.2022, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.07 19.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 09.8.2024, 08.11.2024 and 02.12.2024. Even today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. Vide order dated 09.8.2024 when learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had not been able t establish contact with his client, the co notice to the petitioner. petitioner has been received back served. Despite that, on the next date of hearing i. 02.12.2024 the matter was adjourned on request of learned counsel for the petitioner. counsel for the State, the present writ petition rendered infructuous. petitioner to revive the present writ petition within six weeks from today. mentioned in the Memo of Parties. July 06, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CWP-15901-2001 (O & M) 09.8.2024, 08.11.2024 and 02.12.2024. Even today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. Vide order dated 09.8.2024 when learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had not been able t establish contact with his client, the co-ordinate Bench of this Court issued notice to the petitioner. As per office report dated 05.11.2024, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back served. Despite that, on the next date of hearing i.e. 08.11.2024 none had appeared for the petitioner and on 02.12.2024 the matter was adjourned on request of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the present writ petition rendered infructuous. However, in case anything survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the present writ petition within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) dispos Copy of this order be sent to the petitioner at his address as mentioned in the Memo of Parties. , 2026 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 09.8.2024, 08.11.2024 and 02.12.2024. Even today there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. Vide order dated 09.8.2024 when learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had not been able to ordinate Bench of this Court issued As per office report dated 05.11.2024, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back served. Despite that, on the next date of e. 08.11.2024 none had appeared for the petitioner and on 02.12.2024 the matter was adjourned on request of learned counsel for the n view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been However, in case anything survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the present writ petition within six weeks from today. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. Copy of this order be sent to the petitioner at his address as ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.07 19.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document