SHAM LAL v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITTRAN NIGAM LTD.
CWP/18206/2003 · 2026-07-06
Aman Chaudhary
body2003
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1851 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1851 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 370
CWP-18206-2003 (O&M)
Date of decision: 06.07.2026 SHAM LAL
... Petitioner
Versus UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITTRAN NIGAM LTD.
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition is to the order dated 09.02.2000 by which petitioner was removed from service, might not be surviving especially in wake of there being no interim order.
2.
Disposed of, however, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case any need arises.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 06.07.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.06 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document