ATTAR SINGH AND ANR. v. HARYANA AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD
CWP/18322/2003 · 2026-07-06
Aman Chaudhary
body2003
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1849 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1849 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 371
CWP-18322-2003 (O&M)
Date of decision: 06.07.2026 ATTAR SINGH AND ANR.
... Petitioners
Versus HARYANA AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioners.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the impugned
order dated 09.12.2002 whereby petitioners were held not entitled to arrears of increment prior to passing of type test in view of the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board Services Rules, 1974, which however, was released after they had passed the same, might not be surviving due to efflux of time.
2.
Disposed of, however, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived, in case any need arises.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 06.07.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.06 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document