IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 321 CWP-3549-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.07.2026 NIHAL SINGH ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HY.ETC. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel submits that nothing survives in the present petition as number of policies for regularization have been framed during pendency thereof and the petitioner may have even been considered under the one which, as relevant to him. 2. Disposed of, however, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case any need arises. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 03.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.03 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document