Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
FAO-2198-2003 (O&M) & FAO-4393-2006 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-2198-2003 (O&M) & FAO-4393-2006 Date of decision: 14.05.2026 KARAM SINGH ...Appellant Versus Parkash Kaur and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Jayant Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Vinod Chandheri, Advocate for respondent No.5 – Insurance Company. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Both these appeals have arisen out of the same award dated 18.01.2003 of the MACT, Pa<ala. FAO-2198-2003 was filed by the owner of the offending vehicle, whereas FAO-4393-2006 was filed by the claimants seeking enhancement.
2. Court no<ce was sent to the appellants. Today, the report has been received that the appellant of FAO-2198-2003 has since expired. No<ce to the three appellants of FAO-4393-2006 has been received back unserved with the report of incomplete address.
3. No applica<on to bring on record the LRs of the appellant of FAO-2198-2003 has been filed.
4. No other address of the appellants of FAO-4393-2006 is available.
5. In the aforesaid circumstances, both these appeals stand
disposed of with liberty to get the same revived in case, any cause of ac<on survives.
6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. 14.05.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.05.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document