CRWP No.58
IN TH 173 Khushi Ku State of Pun CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. By w Constitution the official respondent N 2. Notic 3. On th DAG, Punja 4. As pe wishes of members/re 5. Both upon their A Khushi Ku 4.2.2003. 5857 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** hi Kumari and another v. Punjab and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. Hirdeyjeet Singh, Advocat --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed u itution of India, the petitioners are see fficial respondents to protect their lif ndent Nos.4 to 6. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gau , Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the As per the petitioners, they have ma s of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, wh ers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed th their Aadhar Cards indicating that da hi Kumari is 1.10.2007 and petit -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.5857 of 2026 Date of decision: 18.5.2026 Date of uploading : 18.5.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL dvocate for the petitioners iled under Articles 226/227 of the are seeking issuance of directions to eir life and liberty at the hands of s No.1 to 3. r. Gaurav Gurcharan S. Rai, Senior f of the official respondents. ve married on 14.5.2026 against the , who happen to be the family med themselves to be major relying that date of birth of petitioner No.1- petitioner No.2-Omkar Singh is
2026 2026 2026 f the ns to ds of enior t the mily lying - is ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.18 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.58
6. Witho also the me to direct re representatio submitted b two weeks f 7. Keepi married aga respondent petitioners a concerned f endeavour t 8. Liber this order on 9. Howe other case, t taking lawfu 10. The p shall also sta 18.5.2026 Ashwanii 5857 of 2026 hout commenting on the legality he merits of contentions raised in the ect respondent No.2-SSP, SAS Nag entation dated 14.5.2026 (Annexur itted by the petitioners & pass approp eeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both ed against the wishes of their family ndent No.2- SSP, SAS Nagar (Moha ners as well as the parents of both rned family members in his/her pres vour to resolve their dispute(s) and liv Liberty is reserved in favour of privat rder on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found case, then this order shall not preclude lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. P also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
gality and validity of the marriage as in the petition, I deem it appropriate S Nagar (Mohali), to look into the nexure P-5) stated to have been appropriate orders thereupon within both the petitioners claim to have family(s), I direct that if possible, (Mohali) may call a meeting of the both the petitioners and their other er presence so that the parties may nd live amicably. private respondents to seek recall of found to have been involved in any reclude the competent authority from ners. of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
ge as riate o the been ithin have sible, f the other may all of any from any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.18 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document