Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2003 DAILYLAW 1822 (PNJ)

MS PM PIPES PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/15065/2026 · 2026-05-14

Jagmohan Bansal

body2003

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15065-202 IN TH M/s P.M.Pipes P State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Mr. *** JAGMOHAN B 1. The the Constitution the delayed grant 2. This unit operating un letter dated 25.1 subsidy under th 04.07.2003 grant seniority and ope approached this C order dated 20.0 respondent vide interest on accou the respondent se 2026 -1- N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Dat ipes Pvt. Ltd. Versus njab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGM Mr. Abhinav Jain, Advocate, for the Mr. Arun Jindal, Addl. AG, Punjab. *** AN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petit tution of India is seeking direction to grant of capital subsidy of Rs.19,60,0 This is second round of litigation. ting under the name and style of ‘M/s d 25.10.2022 applied for incentive in der the state industrial policy. The granted capital subsidy subject to th nd operation of the unit. The petitione d this Court by way of CWP-26920-20 d 20.09.2019 to pass a speaking or t vide order dated 14.12.2022 sanction account of the delay. It preferred repr dent seeking interest but the same has n NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-15065-2026 Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents AGMOHAN BANSAL for the petitioner. unjab. t petition under Article 226/227 of ion to respondent to grant interest on 9,60,000/-. ation. The petitioner is an industrial f ‘M/s P.M. Pipes Pvt. Ltd.’. It vide tive in the form of assured capital . The respondent vide letter dated t to the funds of the state as well as titioner on not receiving the subsidy 2019 which was disposed of vide ing order qua his application. The nctioned Rs.19,60,000/- but without d representation dated 18.02.2026 to e has not been addressed till date. 7 of st on strial vide pital dated ell as bsidy vide The thout 26 to VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.14 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-15065-202 3. Lear the petition with 4. Dism 14.05.2026 Vimal Wh Wh 2026 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners with liberty to file afresh with better p Dismissed as withdrawn with afores Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye ioners seeks permission to withdraw better particulars. aforesaid liberty. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No draw AL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.14 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.