RAJ KUMARI v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS
RSA/3895/2023 · 2026-02-05
Nidhi Gupta
body2003
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1786 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1786 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 118
Raj Kuma
Uttar Hary
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
1. concurrent the suit for was dismis
2. of law invo Civil Cour 2003, has s Court vide titled as 'M and other c RSA-3895-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
Regular Second Appeal No.3
Date of decision :-05.02.202 Kumari Versus r Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. a
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate wi Ms. Naina Ranot, Advocate fo Ms. Bani Chhibber Mahajan, A respondents.
HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The plaintiff/appellant is in urrent findings rendered by the learne uit for declaration and mandatory inju dismissed.
Learned counsel for the partie w involved in the present appeal as to Court is barred in view of Section , has since been decided by the Hon' t vide judgment dated 14.05.2025 p 'Mahesh Kumar vs. Sub Divisio ther connected appeal(s), Law Finder
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH l No.3895 of 2023 (O & M) .2026 …..Appellant Ltd. and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate ate with cate for ajan, Advocate for the is in second appeal against the learned District Courts, whereby injunction filed by the plaintiff parties are ad idem that question l as to whether jurisdiction of the ction 145 of the Electricity Act, e Hon'ble Division Bench of this 2025 passed in RSA-4181-2016 Divisional Officer and Another Finder Doc Id # 2730461.
VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.06 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3.
disposed o the appropr
4. made in th res judicat plaintiff.
5.
February 0 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
RSA-3895-2023 (O & M) In view of the above, the osed of, with liberty to the appellant ppropriate remedy as available, in acco It is made clear that any evid in the impugned judgments and dec icata in any subsequent proceedings
Pending application(s), if any, uary 05, 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No
2 , the present second appeal is ellant-plaintiff to take recourse to in accordance with law. y evidence recorded/observations nd decrees would not operate as edings initiated by the appellant- f any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.06 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document