CRWP No.4485 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 176 Kirandeep Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: Present: SUMEET GOEL 1. By way of present petition filed under Article Articles 14 and 16 issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 2. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 3. On the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 4. As per the petitioners, they have married on wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to members/relative of the petitioners. 5. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1 Kirandeep 3.12.2003. 4485 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Kirandeep Kaur and another v. Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. N.S. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed under Article Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 On the asking of the Court, Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. As per the petitioners, they have married on wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, who happen to be the family members/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1 Kirandeep Kaur is 27.8.2003 and petitioner No.2 . -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.4485 of 2026 Date of decision: 20.4.2026 Date of uploading : 21.4.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL , Advocate for the petitioners By way of present petition filed under Articles 226/227 read with of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 6. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. As per the petitioners, they have married on 17.4.2026 against the , who happen to be the family Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1- and petitioner No.2-Gurjant Singh is of 2026 .2026 21.4.2026 read with of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab against the , who happen to be the family Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying - is ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.04.21 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.4485 6. Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 into the representation dated been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today. 7. Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married against the wishes of their family(s), I dir respondent No.2 meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence so that the parties may endeavo 8. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. 9. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then thi taking lawful action against the petitioners. 10. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 20.4.2026 Ashwanii 4485 of 2026 Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2-Sr. Superintendent of Police, into the representation dated 17.4.2026 been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married against the wishes of their family(s), I dir spondent No.2- Sr. Superintendent of Police, meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence so that the parties may endeavour to resolve their dispute(s) and live amicably. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2- Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar to look (Annexure P-6) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married against the wishes of their family(s), I direct that if possible, Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence so that the ur to resolve their dispute(s) and live amicably. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any s order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to look ) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have ect that if possible, may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as the parents of both the petitioners and their other concerned family members in his/her presence so that the Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any s order shall not preclude the competent authority from The petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.04.21 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document