THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. MR.SUKDEO VITHOBA THORAT
FA/1076/2003 · 2026-09-02
body2003
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1339 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2003 DAILYLAW 1339 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
LSP 1 14 fa 1076.03.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION First Appeal No. 1076 of 2003
The State of Maharashtra … Appellant V/s. Sukdeo Vithoba Thorat … Respondents. Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar AGP for the State. Mr. Anish Kikle i/b. P.N.Joshi Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J
DATE : 2nd September 2026.
P.C. :
1. Learned AGP submitted that the present appeal falls within the limits prescribed by Government of Maharashtra as per the G.R. dated 3rd November 2016. She invited my attention to the following amounts in L.R. No.401/1991: 1) Land value comes to Rs.3,74,000/- (awarded by the reference Court). 2) Amount paid by SLAO Rs. 94,248/-.
2. According to her the amount enhanced by the Reference Court is not higher than 4 times of the amount paid by SLAO. Hence, she has withdrawn the appeal. LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date: 2026.09.03 12:34:40 +0530
LSP 2 14 fa 1076.03.doc
3. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Refund of Court fee as per the Rules.
(S.M. MODAK, J.)