IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 FAO-2420-2002 Date Of Decision: 10.09.2026 JAI PARKASH ....APPELLANT VERSUS SATOSH KUMARI AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : None for the appellant. Respondents No.1, 2 proforma respondent/claimants and respondent No.5 proforma respondent. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J. (ORAL) 1. As per the office report, notice issued to appellant has been received back unserved with the report that he has died. Intimation has also been given to counsel for the appellant through e-mail. Today neither counsel for the appellant has appeared despite intimation nor LRs of appellant and respondent No.4 have been brought on record till date. 2. It appears that LRs of appellant are not interested in pursuing the present appeal and same is accordingly ordered to be dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the LRs of appellant shall be at liberty to seek revival of the appeal, in case any cause survives. 3. Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE 10.09.2026 Vishal Vardhan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No VISHAL VARDHAN 2026.09.11 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document