103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4511-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Gurdev Singh ......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondents No.5 to 10. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. On 06.07.2026, since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, Registry was directed to issue notice to the petitioner as well as his counsel for the date fixed. 2. As per the office report, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved for want of correct/complete address. It is further reported by the Registry that learned counsel for the petitioner has been elevated to the Bench. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to move an application to revive the present writ petition in case any cause of action survives. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 03.09.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.09.04 11:23 I agree to specified portions of this document