Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2002 DAILYLAW 1742 (PNJ)

AJIT SINGH v. TARO AND ANR.

RSA/1801/2002 · 2026-08-26

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body2002

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA No. 1801 of 2002 (O&M) -1- 214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1801 of 2002 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION:26.08.2026 AJIT SINGH @ HARJIT SINGH ......APPELLANT Vs. TARO AND ANOTHER .........RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Devarya Seth, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Today is the third date in succession on which there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. On the previous date, it was noticed that counsel for the appellant had been served; however, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Consequently, notice was issued to the appellant. 2. Now, as per the report of the Registry, notice issued to the appellant has been received back duly served through his sister. However, despite service, there is still no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal. 3. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. NITIN 2026.08.26 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No. 1801 of 2002 (O&M) -2- 4. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to seek restoration of the appeal, if so advised, by moving an appropriate application in this regard, in accordance with law. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. AUGUST 26, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No NITIN 2026.08.26 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document