-1- 104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3231-2002 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 M. C. SANGRUR ...Appellant Versus M/S PUNJAB PAPER BOARDRICE MILLS ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) On 20.07.2026, none has put in appearance on behalf of appellant despite service upon appellant and due intimation to learned counsel for the appellant. Even today, none has not put in appearance on behalf of appellant despite case being adjourned from 20.07.2026 to today. 2. It seems that appellant is no more interested in prosecuting present appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in default for non- prosecution, with liberty to seek revival on showing just cause. 4. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of accordingly. (PARMOD GOYAL) 23.07.2026 JUDGE Ravinder Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.24 15:02 I agree to specified portions of this document