Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-1383-2002 (O&M) &COCP-883-2004 (O&M)
- 1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104
Date of decision: 23.07.2026
1.
RSA-1383-2002 (O&M) JAGDISH SINGH ....Appellant Versus SHINDER SINGH
...Respondent
2.
COCP-883-2004 (O&M) JAGDISH SINGH ....Petitioner Versus SHINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Gurbinder Singh, Advocate for the appellant/petitioner (Through VC).
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not able to contact the appellant and it appears that the appellant has lost interest in the matter.
2. In view of the statement made by counsel for the appellant, the appeal as well as the contempt petition are dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the appellant may get the proceedings revived in case any cause survives.
3. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 23.07.2026
JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2026.07.23 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment