SA No. 569 of 2002 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL SA No. 569 of 2002 1. Kesavan S/o Munuswamy Naicker 118, B Block, Housing Board, Nattan Thottam, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 2. Krishnan, S/o Munuswamy Naicker 118, B Block, Housing Board, Nattan Thottam, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 3. Andhiri S/o Munuswamy Naicker, Neikuppy Village, Madurantakam Taluk, Kancheepuram District. ..Appellants/ Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs 1. Dhanapal Naicker S/o Narayanaswamy Naicker 2. Govindasamy Naicker S/o Chinnasamy Naicker 3. Varadhan S/o Chinnasamy Naicker 4. Devan S/o Chinnasamy Naicker https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 569 of 2002 __________ Page2 of 4 5. Rajeswari Ammal W/o Vajiravel Naicer 6. Gajendran, S/o Vajiravel Naicer 7. Panjali D/o Vajiravel Naicer 8. Minor Pushpa D/o Vajiravel Naicer 9. Minor Anjalai D/o Vajiravel Naicer (8&9) Rep. by their Mother and Guardian Rajeswari Ammal) ( 1 to 9 residing at Neikuppy Village, Kallapiranpuram Post, Madurantakam Taluk) 10.Chandra W/o Balasundaram 11.Sekar S/o Balasundaram ( 10 & 11 residing at Kottur No.31C, Guruvappa Naicker Street, Madras -86) ..Respondents/ Respondents/ Defendants. Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the judgement and decree dated 25.04.2001 made in A.S.No.43 of 1999 on the file of the Sub Court Madurantakam confirming the judgement and decree dated 17.12.1997 made in O.S.No.222 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurantakam. For Appellants: No appearance For Respondents: No appearance https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 569 of 2002 __________ Page3 of 4 Judgment When the matter was listed before this Court on 05.06.2026, this Court passed the following order: “Mr.N.K.Sivakumar representing Mr.M.S.Subramanian, Counsel on record for the Appellants 1 & 2 is before this Court and submits that the Counsel on record has already filed a Memo dated 02.06.20265 stating that he has no instructions from the Appellants 1 & 2. 2.In view of the above submission made by the Counsel representing the Appellants 1 & 2, this Court directs the Registry to print the name of the Appellants 1 & 2 in the cause list on 10.06.2026 and list this Second Appeal on 10.06.2026.” 2. Today, the names of Appellants Nos. 1 and 2 were shown in the Cause List and the same is reproduced hereunder: “appl1 -KESAVAN -NA appl 2 - KRISHNAN (vide court order dt: 05.06.2026” 3. Despite their names being shown in the Cause List, the Appellants neither appeared nor contested the case. There was no representation on behalf of the Appellants. The Appellants were called, ‘absent’. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 569 of 2002 __________ Page4 of 4 R.SAKTHIVEL J. JRS 4. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No JRS To 1.The Sub Court, Madurantakam. 2.The District Munsif Court, Madurantakam. SA No. 569 of 2002 10-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis