Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2002 DAILYLAW 1613 (PNJ)

PREETO ALIAS PRITAM KAUR v. VEERO ETC

RSA/2248/2002 · 2026-07-02

Parmod Goyal

body2002

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 243 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2248-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 PREETO ALIAS PRITAM KAUR & ANR ....Appellants Versus VEERO & ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) On previous date of hearing, notices were issued to the appellants on request of learned counsel for the appellants which have been received back with the report that appellant No.1 has since died and appellant No.2 is not residing at given address. None has come forward on their behalf to contest the present appeal. 2. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed in default for non- prosecution, with liberty to seek revival on showing just cause. 4. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of accordingly. (PARMOD GOYAL) 02.07.2026 JUDGE Ravinder Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.03 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document