201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3650-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.05.2026 Balwant Singh ... Petitioner Versus The Joint Development Commissioner (IRD) and Another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : None for the petitioner. Ms. Mandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab for respondent No.1. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. On 07.04.2026 the following order was passed : “The matter has been listed today after admission on 12.09.2006. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In view thereof, let notice be issued to the petitioner through the Civil Judge (Senior Division) concerned, returnable 25.05.2026.” 2. As per office report, the petitioner remains unserved due to incomplete address. There is no other address of the petitioner available except for the one mentioned in the memo of parties. 3. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution. JITENDER KUMAR 2026.05.26 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CWP-3650-2002 -2- 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 25.05.2026 jk ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2026.05.26 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh