FAO-4251-2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (227) FAO-4251-2002 Date of Decision : 13.05.2026 RAMESH KUMAR ...Appellant Versus SUBHASH CHAND ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Deepak Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Ram Avtar, Advocate for respondent No.3-Oriental Insurance Company. Mr. Neeraj Raizada, Advocate for respondent No.6-United Insurance Company. *** Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral) 1. No one has appeared on behalf of the appellants for a considerable period of time. It has also been reported that the appellant has since expired. 2. In view of the above, it is apparent that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the legal representatives of the appellant to seek revival of the appeal, subject to limitation, upon showing sufficient cause. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. May 13, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) Poonam JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No POONAM 2026.05.14 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document