208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR-1030-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Mangat Ram . . . . Petitioner Vs. Municipal Committee Sirsa and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the petitioner. Ms.Vanshika Rana, Advocate, for Mr.Shrenik Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.1. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Except for certain notings made by the Registry, nothing else is available on the file. From the details retrieved from Mozilla, it appears that the present revision was filed by Mangat Ram against Municipal Committee Sirsa and others, through Mr.J.S. Thind, Advocate. However, the copy of the grounds of revision as well as the impugned order are not available on record. 2. Today, though the appearance has been made on behalf of respondent No.1, but nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that filing counsel Mr.J.S. Thind has been duly informed through email, as reported by Registry. 3. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and in the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, it appears that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 11.05.2026 JUDGE
 Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.05.11 17:39 I agree to specified portions of this document Chandigarh