214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2564-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 11, 2026 Sa+sh Kumar Monga … Appellant Versus Indian Bank and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Prajesh Sachdeva, Advocate for Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondents. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Mr. Prajesh Sachdeva, Advocate has appeared for Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the appellant, informs that despite wring a le er to the appellant, he has not contacted. Thus, the counsel is not able to establish contact with the appellant. The suit of the plainff-bank for recovery was decreed and the Appellate Court had affirmed the findings. The appeal was filed by the defendant against the concurrent findings. Since the said appellant has not contacted his counsel, despite sending a le er to him, as informed by learned counsel, it appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. May 11, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.05.11 17:38 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order