224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2776-2002 Date of Decision: March 24, 2026 Reshma and others … Appellants Versus Kalu Ram Gujjar and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellants. Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Pursuant to the order dated 11.11.2025, Court no ces were sent to the appellants. The same have been received with the report that the given address is incomplete. The addresses of the appellants as men oned in the memo of par es are the same as was men oned in the award passed by the Tribunal. No other addresses of the appellants are available. In the aforesaid circumstances, present appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecu on with liberty to the appellants to get it revived, in case any cause of ac on s ll survives. March 24, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.03.27 10:42 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order