IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 226 FAO-5869-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:02.02.2026 Hardial Singh and Others …..Appellants Vs. Punjab Roadways, Ludhiana and Another .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punjab for the respondent. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representa on on behalf of the appellant. On the previous date of hearing, it was informed by counsel for the appellants that despite all possible efforts, he was unable to contact the appellants. No ce to the appellants was issued. No ce issued to appellant Nos.1 and 2 received back unserved with the report that they are not found at the given address; whereas appellant No.3 is reported to have expired. No other address of appellant Nos.1 and 2 is available except the address men oned in the memo of the par es and so, it is not possible for this Court to send fresh no ce to them. No one has put in appearance to be impleaded as LRs of appellant No.3. In all the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present appeal is hereby disposed of with liberty to the appellant/LRs of appellant No.3 to get it revived, in case, any cause of ac on survives. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE February 02, 2026 Nee ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.02.03 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document