CRWP No.2518
IN TH 191 Gursewak S State of Pun CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. By w Constitution official resp respondent N 2. Notic 3. On th accepts noti 4. As pe wishes of members/re 5. Both upon their A Gursewak S 24.2.2002. 518of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** ewak Singh and another v. of Punjab and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. L.S. Lakhanpal, Advocate --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed itution of India, petitioners are seekin al respondents to protect their life ndent Nos.4 to 10. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 On the asking of the Court, Mr. Adhi ts notice on behalf of the official respo As per the petitioners, they have ma s of respondent Nos. 4 to 10, wh ers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed th their Aadhar Cards indicating that da wak Singh is 15.10.1999 and petitio 002. -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.2518 of 2026 Date of decision: 6.3.2026 Date of uploading : 7.3.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL ocate for the petitioners filed under Article 226 of the seeking issuance of directions to the r life and liberty at the hands of s No.1 to 3. r. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab l respondents. ave married on 2.7.2025 against the 0, who happen to be the family med themselves to be major relying that date of birth of petitioner No.1- petitioner No.2-Sumanpreet Kaur is
2026 2026 6 the o the s of njab t the mily lying - ur is ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.03.07 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2518
6. Witho also the me to direct re Sahib to lo stated to hav thereupon w 7. Keepi married aga respondent call a meet petitioners a so that the amicably. 8. Liber this order on 9. Howe other case, t taking lawfu 10. The p shall also sta 6.3.2026 Ashwanii 518of 2026 Without commenting on the legality he merits of contentions raised in the rect respondent No.2-Senior Superin to look into the representation date to have been submitted by the petitio pon within two weeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both ed against the wishes of their family ndent No.2- Senior Superintendent of meeting of the petitioners as wel ners and their other concerned family at the parties may endeavour to re bly. Liberty is reserved in favour of privat rder on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found case, then this order shall not preclude lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. P also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
gality and validity of the marriage as in the petition, I deem it appropriate uperintendent of Police, Fatehgarh n dated 26.2.2026 (Annexure P-5) petitioners & pass appropriate orders both the petitioners claim to have family(s), I direct that if possible, ent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib may s well as the parents of both the family members in his/her presence to resolve their dispute(s) and live private respondents to seek recall of found to have been involved in any reclude the competent authority from ners. of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
ge as riate garh 5) rders have ble, may the ence live all of any from any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.03.07 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document