205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1263-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 06, 2026 Guldev Raj … Appellant Versus The State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Garg, AAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.3 to 5. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) A$er being admi'ed way back in October, 2003, the appeal has been listed today for the first -me for actual hearing. 2. Nobody is appearing for the appellant. 3. Learned counsel appearing for State of Punjab has pointed out that the appellant was re-red a$er a'aining the age of 58 years w.e.f. 31.08.1992. The suit was field by the appellant by claiming that he was en-tled to be retained -ll the age of 60 years. Learned State counsel submits that the suit was dismissed by both the Courts below and the present appeal against the concurrent findings, has been rendered infructuous. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, present appeal is disposed, having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the appellant to get it revived, in case any cause of ac-on s-ll survives. March 06, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.03.06 13:56 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order