FAO-4949-2002 [111] [1] Paras Cold Haryana El [2] Paras Rice Haryana El [3] Muni Rolle Haryana El [4] Molly Too Haryana El [5] Data Ram Haryana El [6] Pawan Rice Haryana El 2002 (O&M) and connected matter IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA FAO-4949 Date of De s Cold Storage and Ice Factory Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4950 s Rice Mills Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4951 i Roller Floor Mills Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4954 y Tools Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4957 Ram Om Parkash Oils versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4959 n Rice Mills Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 4949-2002 (O&M) of Decision : 25.03.2026 …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4950-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4951-2002 (O&M) …Appellants mission ….Respondent 4954-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4957-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4959-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 1 RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:20 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-4949-2002 [7] Kapur Rice Haryana El [8] Shri Ganes Haryana El [9] Chotani Ric Haryana El [10] Parshada M Haryana El Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] Haryana El 2002 (O&M) and connected matter FAO-4961 r Rice Mills Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4962 Ganesh Rice Mills Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4963 ani Rice Mills Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio FAO-4964 ada Mal Mukandi Lal Rice Sheller Versus ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advoc in FAO-4951-2002. Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Advoca in FAO-4959-2002, FAO-496 Mr. Sanjiv Pabbi, Advocate Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Sen Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2 (in all the **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present appeals are direct ana Electricity Regulatory Commissio 4961-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4962-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4963-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent 4964-2002 (O&M) …Appellant mission ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN dvocate for the appellant(s) dvocate for the appellant(s) 4961-2002 & FAO-4962-2002. for respondent No.1-HERC. n, Senior Advocate with all the appeals.) directed against order passed by the mission relating to the tariff orders. 2 y the RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:20 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-4949-2002 [2] present ord aforesaid infructuous [3] [4] disposed of [5] cases. 25.03.2026 ‘R. Sharma' 2002 (O&M) and connected matter Counsels are ad idem that su nt order, the tariffs have been repea said development, the present ctuous by efflux of time. Ordered accordingly. All pending miscellaneous ed off. Photocopy of this order be pl .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable hat subsequent to the passing of the repeatedly revised. In view of the sent appeals have been rendered eous application(s), if any, stands be placed on the file of connected (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 3 f the of the dered tands ected RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:20 I agree to specified portions of this document