IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 202 CR-345-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:06.02.2026 Ramesh and Others …..Pe//oners Vs. Ram Dass .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the peoners. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) In compliance of the order dated 24.11.2023, Court noce to the pares was sent. As per the report received from the Registry, peoner Nos.1 and 2 have expired. Peoner No.4 has been duly served through his daughter-in-law; whereas peoner No.6 has been duly served. Noce issued to peoner No.3 not received back served or otherwise; whereas noce issued to peoner No.5 received back unserved due to incorrect address as there is no ‘Nirjan Colony’. The sole respondent is reported to have expired. Learned counsel through whom this revision peon was filed was earlier reported to have died. Considering the fact that out of 06 peoners, 02 of them have been duly served and no representaon has been made on their behalf; nor any applicaon is moved to bring on record the LRs of the NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.02.06 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-345-2002 (O&M) deceased-peoners, it appears that peoners are no longer interested in pursuing the peon. In these circumstances, present peon is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE February 06, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.02.06 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document