Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 223 I.
RSA-2492-2002 (O&M) Khajani Devi and Others
…..Appellants Vs. Krishan Lal and Others
.….Respondents II.
RSA-2493-2002 (O&M) Gainda Ram and Others
…..Appellants Vs. Krishan Lal and Others
.….Respondents III.
RSA-2494-2002 (O&M) Gainda Ram
…..Appellant Vs. Krishan Lal and Another
.….Respondents IV.
RSA-2495-2002 (O&M) Gainda Ram and Others
…..Appellants Vs. Krishan Lal and Others
.….Respondents Date of Decision:24.02.2026 CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant(s). Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5 in RSA-2492-2002; for respondent No.2 in RSA-2493-2002; for respondent No.2 in RSA-2494-2002 and for respondent Nos.2 and 3 in RSA-2495-2002. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) It is set of four appeals, all filed by the same persons. As nobody was put in appearance on behalf of the appellants, no.ce to the appellants was directed to be issued.
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.02.24 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA-2492-2002 (O&M); RSA-2493-2002 (O&M);
RSA-2494-2002 (O&M); RSA-2495-2002 (O&M) -2- As per the report received from the Registry, appellant No.1 has expired. Appellant Nos.2 & 4; and 5 of the LRs of appellant No.3 have been duly served; whereas three LRs of appellant No.3 are unserved. None of the appellants who have been duly served have come forward. No applica.on has been moved to bring on record LRs of the deceased-appellant No.1. No other address of the unserved LRs of appellant No.3, except the address as men.oned in memo of par.es is available. In all the aforesaid circumstances, when it appears that interest of all the appellants are common and most of the appellants have been served and they are not coming forward, it appears that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing these appeals. Consequently all these appeals stands dismissed for want of prosecu.on. Pending applica.on(s), if any, also stands disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case files.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE February 24, 2026 Nee.ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.02.24 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document