RSA-682- 202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA State of Punjab and others Bhupinder Singh and another CORAM: Present: DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) 1. Court would show that counsel was issued. 2. respondents has been received back with a report that the party had taken back brief of the case from their counsel i.e. Mr. Atul Advocate and he is no longer counsel in this case. Advocate has 3. 4. counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants execution of the -2002 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Punjab and others Versus Bhupinder Singh and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab for the appellants. None for the respondents. ***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) A perusal of the order dated Court would show that fresh notice to the respondents as well as their counsel was issued. As per report of the Registry, notice issued to the respondents has been received back with a report that the party had taken back brief of the case from their counsel i.e. Mr. Atul Advocate and he is no longer counsel in this case. Advocate has also been informed via e-mail about the date fixed. There is no representation on behalf of the Taking into consideration the abovesaid facts, learne counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants execution of the judgment and decree passed by the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-682-2002 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.4.2026 ...Appellants ...Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) order dated 05.02.2026 passed by this fresh notice to the respondents as well as their As per report of the Registry, notice issued to the respondents has been received back with a report that the party had taken back brief of the case from their counsel i.e. Mr. Atul Jain, Advocate and he is no longer counsel in this case. Mr. Atul Jain, mail about the date fixed. There is no representation on behalf of the respondents. Taking into consideration the abovesaid facts, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the passed by the learned Appellate RAMANDEEP SINGH 2026.04.27 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-682- Court was stayed by this Court on regular second appeal may be disposed of having been not further with liberty to revive the same in case, any effort is made by the respondent Court executed. 5. 6. any direction from this Court, judgment and decree of the Appellate Court 7. of. 27.4.2026 Ramandeep Singh Whether Whether Reportable : -2002 (O&M) -2- was stayed by this Court on 04.02.2002 regular second appeal may be disposed of having been not further with liberty to revive the same in case, any effort is made by the respondents to get the judgment and decree of the executed. Ordered accordingly. Executing Court is also directed that without there bei any direction from this Court, judgment and decree of the Appellate Court be not executed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned : Whether Reportable : 04.02.2002, hence, the present regular second appeal may be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, any effort is made by the to get the judgment and decree of the learned Appellate Executing Court is also directed that without there being any direction from this Court, judgment and decree of the learned Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE Yes No Yes No RAMANDEEP SINGH 2026.04.27 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document