IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 FAO-746-2002 (O&M) Date of decision :20.04.2026 HARBANS SINGH AND ANOTHER ... APPELLANTS VERSUS JAL KAUR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Farheen Bajwa, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that she has no instructions, as the company has closed after being sold and appellant No. 1 has expired. Further, notices were issued directly to appellant No. 1, which have been received back with the report that appellant No. 1 has since died and appellant No. 2 stands closed. 2. In these circumstances, when the whereabouts of the appellants are unknown and no one is appearing on their behalf. This Court is left with no other option except to dismiss present appeal for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellants to get the same revived by showing sufficient cause. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. 20.04.2026 (PARMOD GOYAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.04.20 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document