Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2002 DAILYLAW 1442 (PNJ)

SUKHJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. MAYA KAUR AND OTHERS

FAO/3677/2002 · 2026-04-23

Parmod Goyal

body2002

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 FAO-3677-2002 (O&M) Date of decision:23.04.2026 SUKHJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ...APPELLANTS VERSUS MAYA KAUR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Notice issued to appellants No.1 and 2 received back with report ‘died’. 2. Notice issued to appellant No.3 received back with report ‘served through daughter-in-law’. 3. Despite repeated calls, neither appellants nor anyone on their behalf has put in appearance before this Court. No representation has been made on behalf of respondents also. 4. It seems appellants are not interested pursing the present appeal. 5. In these circumstances, present appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution with liberty to appellants to get the same revived by showing just cause. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 23.04.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.04.24 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document