907-FA-623-2002.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 623 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant Versus Shri Remond Rujoy Goddard And Ors. ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 7727 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 623 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra Through The Collector Kolhapur ...Appellant Versus Ramond Rujoy Goddard And Ors. ...Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Dr. A. A. Takalkar, AGP for the Appellant. Mr. Anand Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. Rishikesh Mohite a/w Nikhil Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2B to E. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 10th September, 2026. P.C. : 1. This Appeal is of the year 2002. 2. By the present Appeal, the Appellant has impugned Judgment and Decree dated 27.10.1999, passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gadhinglaj, in Special Civil Suit No. 104 of 1996. Arjun 1 907-FA-623-2002.docx 3. Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, submits that the Respondent No. 1 is deceased. He states that no steps have been taken to bring the legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No. 1, on record and as such, the Appeal would stand abated. 4. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned AGP for the Appellant and Mr. Rishikesh Mohite, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2B to 2E, confirm the statement made by Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. 5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Anand Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, this Appeal is disposed of as abated. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 2 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.09.15 14:31:26 +0530