R. C. CHOPRA ( 1 ) ( 2 ) TRIAL Court recorded perused. ( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the State admits that there is no eye witness in this case. The prosecution case is based upon circumstantial evidence which consists of the allegations that the petitioner and his co-accused used, to live with the deceased in the same jhughi and were doing some business in which some disputes had arisen. The prosecution is also relying upon the recovery of a broken bottle and a knife on which human blood was found but the blood group could not be matched with the blood group of deceased. The other circumstance that is being pleaded against the petitioner is that after the incident he was not found available for about 10 days in his jhughi. Material evidence has already been recorded in the trial Court. ( 4 ) CONSIDERING the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last about 2- years, the application for bail is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000. 00 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.