Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2001 DAILYLAW 336 (GAU)

RUMA MEDHI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/2001/2026 · 2026-06-02

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010068222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2001/2026 RUMA MEDHI D/O LATE SIDDIRAM MEDHI ALIAS KHIDDHIRAM MEDHI, R/O VILL. HAHARA, BORGOG, P.O. HAHARA, P.S. SONAPUR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN 782402 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI 06 2:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER/SECRETARY GAUHATI HIGH COURT OLD BUILDING GUWAHATI DIST- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN- 781001 3:THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY KAMRUP(M) REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER/SECRETARY DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE'S COURT CAMPUS PANBAZAR GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 780001 4:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE SONAPUR POLICE STATION P.O- SONAPUR DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM PIN- 78240 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R Deka, S I AKAND Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORTY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 03.06.2026 Mr. S. I. Akand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority. Mr. R. Das, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant