203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9356-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2026 YOGESH KUMAR ..Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate Mr. B.S. Patwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.2. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent-college to confirm the petitioner as lecturer in Civil Engineering in view of Bye Law 11 of the Bye Laws of the college on completion of 3 years of service with all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that nothing survives in the present writ petition since the relief sought is redressed. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. Dismissed as infructuous. SAHIL 2026.09.11 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-9356-2001 (O&M) -2- 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. 11.09.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) SAHIL JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2026.09.11 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.