Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2001 DAILYLAW 1738 (PNJ)

JAGDISH CHANDER v. ROOP CHAND AND OTHERS

RSA/1088/2001 · 2026-07-22

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-1088-2001 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113+226 RSA-1088-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 JAGDISH CHANDER (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS ....Appellant(s) Versus ROOP CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate for LRs of the applicant/appellant. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) CRM-9395-C-2026 1. Prayer in this application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC is for bringing on record the legal representatives of appellant namely Jagdish Chander (since deceased). 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and legal representatives of appellant namely Jagdish Chander are ordered to be impleaded as appellant No.1 (i) and (ii) in the present appeal, subject to all just exceptions. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. 3. Application stands disposed of. CRM-9575-C-2026 4. Prayer in this application under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC read with Section 151 of CPC is for impleading the legal representatives of respondent no.1 PRIYANKA THAKUR 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-1088-2001 (O&M) -2- namely Roop Chand (since deceased). 5. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and legal representative of respondent no.1 namely Roop Chand is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.1(i to vi) in the present appeal, subject to all just exceptions. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. 6. Application stands disposed of. CM-9396-C-2026 7. The present application under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed for withdrawal of the main appeal, i.e., RSA-1088-2001, as the matter has been amicably compromised between the parties. 8. In view of the prayer made in the application, the same is allowed. RSA-1088-2001 9. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the main case is permitted to be withdrawn. 10. Dismissed as withdrawn. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 22.07.2026 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PRIYANKA THAKUR 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document