BISHAN SINGH v. THE SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER,,FEROZEPUR
CWP/8356/2001 · 2026-07-22
Pankaj Jain
body2001
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2001 DAILYLAW 1725 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2001 DAILYLAW 1725 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Sr. No.: 213 Civil Writ Petition No.8356 of 2001 Date of Decision: July 22, 2026
Bishan Singh ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS The Superintending Canal Officer, Ferozepur & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
PRESENT: - None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Shukla, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
PANKAJ JAIN, J (Oral)
1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has assailed orders dated 13.10.1999 (Annexure P-5) and 10.11.2000 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Canal authorities.
2. The petition was admitted without any interim order on
01.06.2001. More than 25 years have passed, parties must have reconciled to the orders.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
4. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
July 22, 2026 avin
Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document