215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5232-2001 (O&M) Decided on : July 21, 2026 TEXTILE MAZDOOR UNION, GURGAON . . . Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. D.S. Gill, Advocate for Mr. A.D.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Gursimran Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Saloni Chhabra, Advocate for Mr. Hemant Bassi, Senior Advocate for respondent No.4. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that despite making best of the efforts, they failed to contact their respective clients to get required instructions to plead the case on their behalf. Learned counsel for the parties expressed their inability to assist the Court in the absence of any instructions from their respective clients. 2. In view of the circumstances and the position recorded hereinabove, this Court is left with no other option except to dispose of the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the present writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, in case, any substantive issue still exists along with a cause of action to the respective parties. (KIRTI SINGH) July 21, 2026 JUDGE Ritika Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RITIKA 2026.07.22 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh