IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 206 CWP-19826-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 RAJESH KUMAR ... Petitioner VERSUS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for Mr. K.L. Arora, Advocate the petitioner. Mr. Pranab Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition might not be surviving due to efflux of time as the petitioner who came in service on 01.06.1991 might have been retired. 2. Disposed of accordingly, however, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause of action still subsists. 3. Other misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 14, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.14 18:43 I am the author of this document