IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (203) CWP-4890-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: - 06.07.2026 Jyoti Goel ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate, (Through VC), for applicant/respondents No.5 to 15. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to inform the Court as to whether the petitioner wishes to pursue the present writ petition or not. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case she wants to pursue the present writ petition or in case any cause survives. 3. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of in view of the above-said order. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 06, 2026 naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement