NACHHATTAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. RUPINDER KAUR AND OTHERS
FAO/704/2001 · 2026-07-06
Parmod Goyal
body2001
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2001 DAILYLAW 1659 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2001 DAILYLAW 1659 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
236
(1) FAO-704-2001 Date of decision :06.07.2026
NACHHATTAR SINGH AND ANOTHER
... APPELLANTS
VERSUS RUPINDER KAUR AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
(2) FAO-705-2001
NACHHATTAR SINGH AND ANOTHER
... APPELLANTS
VERSUS AKASH PREET SINGH @ AKASHDEEP SINGH ...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None.
****
PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
None is appearing on behalf of the appellants. Accordingly, notices were issued to the appellants.
2.
As per the office report, appellant No. 1 has expired, and appellant No. 2 could not be served as he has left India and gone abroad.
3.
In these circumstances, it appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
4.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.09 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
FAO-704-2001
-2- FAO-705-2001
5.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case.
06.07.2026
(PARMOD GOYAL) manoj
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes
Whether reportable
Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.09 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document