CWP-14341-2001 (O&M) IN TH Jagdish Chan State of Punja CORAM: Present: - NAMIT KUM 1. by filing the i India seeking whereby profi quashing the person who h increment. Fu respondents to completion of benefits. 2. the last date of petitioners for the petitioners &M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Chand & another Versus Punjab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAM None for the petitioners. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Pun *** KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioners have invoked the the instant petition under Articles 2 eking a writ of certiorari for quash proficiency step-up given to the petit g the instructions issued by the resp who had forgo promotion is not enti nt. Further, seeking issuance of a wr ents to grant the petitioners benefits ion of 8 and 18 years of satisfactory Since there was no representation date of hearing i.e. 17.02.2026, notice rs for today and also to Mr. Tribhaw tioners. As per office report, notice UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH CWP-14341-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 …Petitioners …Respondents NAMIT KUMAR G, Punjab ed the writ jurisdiction of this Court icles 226/227 of the Constitution of quashing order dated 20.09.1989, e petitioners was withdrawn and for e respondents to the effect that the ot entitled to proficiency step-up in f a writ of mandamus directing the enefits of additional increments on ctory service with all consequential tation on behalf of the petitioners on otice was ordered to be issued to the ibhawan Singla, learned counsel for otice issued to the petitioners have ourt n of 989, d for t the p in g the s on ntial on o the l for have VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-14341-2001 (O&M) been received the petitioners present petitio 3. 4. present petitio 21.05.2026 Vimal &M) (2) eived back served. However, there is ioners. It appears that the petitioners a petition. Dismissed for non prosecution. However, liberty is granted to petition in case any cause still survives Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable ere is no representation on behalf of oners are not interested to pursue the ion. to the petitioners to revive the rvives. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No lf of e the the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.