IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Har Gian & others Raj Kumar CORAM: Present: DEEPAK that despite all possible efforts he could not be appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. injunction filed by the trial Court on (appellants herein) 10.11.2001. pursuing the instant appeal, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to get it revived in case any cause of action survives. 12.02.2026 Vimal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1588 Date of Decision: Har Gian & others Versus Raj Kumar & others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. Neeraj Mann, Advocate, for Mr. B.S.Rana, Advocate, for the appellant Ms. Anavi, Advocate, for Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate, for the respondents. DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral) It has been stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that despite all possible efforts including he could not be able to establish contact with them. appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. It is also noticed that the suit for declaration and injunction filed by the plaintiffs (appellants herein) was dismissed by the trial Court on 27.04.2000 and the appeal filed by the said plaintiffs (appellants herein) was dismissed by the first Appellate Court on 10.11.2001. Thus, this appeal was filed against concurrent findings. As it appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the instant appeal, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to get it revived in case any cause of action survives. 12.02.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 588-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 …Appellant ...Respondents DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. Neeraj Mann, Advocate, for Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate, for the respondents. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the appellants including writing letters to the appellants, able to establish contact with them. It appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. It is also noticed that the suit for declaration and permanent plaintiffs (appellants herein) was dismissed by the e appeal filed by the said plaintiffs was dismissed by the first Appellate Court on Thus, this appeal was filed against concurrent findings. As it appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the instant appeal, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to get it revived in case any cause of action (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No It has been stated by the learned counsel for the appellants appellants, It appears that the permanent plaintiffs (appellants herein) was dismissed by the e appeal filed by the said plaintiffs was dismissed by the first Appellate Court on As it appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the instant appeal, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to get it revived in case any cause of action VIMAL KUMAR 2026.02.13 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document