Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2001 DAILYLAW 1602 (PNJ)

AMAR KAUR v. BUTA SINGH AND ANR

RSA/4194/2001 · 2026-04-28

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-4194-2001(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (229) RSA-4194-2001(O&M) Date of Decision:-28.04.2026 Amar Kaur (Since deceased) through LRs ……Appellant Versus Buta Singh and Another ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: Mr. Saarib Aggarwal, Advocate, for the appellant. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite repeated efforts, he has not been able to establish contact with the legal representatives of deceased appellant. Even today, learned counsel has expressed his inability to proceed further in the matter as he continues to have no instructions or communication from the LRs of deceased appellant. 2. It, therefore, appears that the legal representatives of appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period. 4. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. 5. However, liberty is granted to legal representatives of the appellant to seek revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any worthwhile cause survives for consideration. SHUBHAM 2026.05.01 10:50 I am the author of this document RSA-4194-2001(O&M) 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 28.04.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2026.05.01 10:50 I am the author of this document