215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3694-2001 Date of Decision: November 03, 2025 Smt. Savitri Devi and others … Appellants Versus M/s Na6onal Insurance Company Limited and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellants. Mr. Rahul Pathania, Advocate for Mr. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.1 – Insurance Company. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) There is no representa"on on behalf of the appellants despite the fact that learned counsel for the appellants has been duly informed, as reported by the Registry. Appellant No.1 was also duly served as reported by the Registry. It appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu"on. November 03, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.11.03 15:52 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order