Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2001 DAILYLAW 1592 (PNJ)

SOHAN LAL KATYAL v. F.C.& SECTY. TO GOVT.OF HY.& ANR.

CWP/16275/2001 · 2026-03-25

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CWP-16275-2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201 CWP-16275-2001 Date of decision:25.03.2026 Sohan Lal Katyal .....Petitioner VERSUS Financial Commissioner & Secretary to the Government Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Deepak Goyat, Advocate for Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. AG Haryana-State. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order (Annexure P-1) vide which the appeal of petitioner for change of allocation from Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited to Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited has been rejected as well as the order dated 08.03.2000 (Annexure P-3) vide which the representation was rejected for the first time and further directing the respondents to allocate the petitioner to Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited. PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.27 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP-16275-2001 2. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and filed his Power of Attorney, which is ordered to be taken on record. Registry is directed to place the same at an appropriate place. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. He, therefore, prays that the present writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 25.03.2026 Puneet Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.27 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document