Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 220 I.
RSA-2454-2001 (O&M) Mohd. Bashir @ Mohamad Bashir Ahmed
…..Appellant Vs. Chandra Mohani Jain and Ors
.….Respondents II.
RSA-1143-2006 (O&M) Kesri Dass Jain thr LRs and Ors
…..Appellants Vs. Mohd. Bashir @ Mohd. Bashir Ahmed and Anr .….Respondents Date of Decision:18.03.2026 CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) On the previous date of hearing, following order was passed:
“These are cross appeals and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate as well as Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate, who are represen%ng the par%es in both the appeals have been duly informed about the date fixed telephonically and through text message, as reported by the Registry. However, there is no representa%on on behalf of any of the par%es. Although, it appears that par%es are no longer interested in pursuing these appeals, s%ll in the interest of jus%ce, adjourned to 19.01.2026, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file.” Despite the strict order, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided, none of the counsels of any of the par%es has appear in these two appeals.
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.03.18 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA-2454-2001 (O&M) RSA-1143-2006 (O&M) -2- It clearly appears from the circumstances that none of the par%es are interested in pursuing these appeals. Consequently, both these appeals are hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecu%on. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE March 18, 2026 Nee%ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.03.18 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document