Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2001 DAILYLAW 1572 (PNJ)

JAI KARAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/14425/2001 · 2026-03-16

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CWP-14425-2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CWP-14425-2001 Date of decision:16.03.2026 Jai Karan .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Harsh Kinra with Ms. Apoorva Kinra, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana -State. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 02.07.2001 (Annexure P-5) and further praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of petitioner from the retrospective effect along with all consequential service benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition, as the grievance raised by the petitioner has been substantially redressed. He, PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.27 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP-14425-2001 therefore, prays that the present writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 16.03.2026 Puneet Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.27 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document