Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2001 DAILYLAW 1570 (PNJ)

MANJIT KAUR v. RASHPAL SINGH ETC

FAO/3760/2001 · 2026-03-10

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body2001

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-3760-2001(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (218) FAO-3760-2001(O&M) Date of Decision:-10.03.2026 Manjit Kaur ……Appellant Versus Rashpal Singh and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: None for the parties. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1. As per the report of the Registry, intimation regarding the pendency of the present case has been duly conveyed to the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. A perusal of the case file reveals that on the last two consecutive dates of hearing, i.e. 22.01.2026 and 10.12.2025, neither the appellant nor anyone on his behalf appeared before the Court. Even today, there is no representation on their behalf. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period. 4. It, therefore, appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. -1- SHUBHAM 2026.03.11 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order FAO-3760-2001(O&M) 6. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to seek revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any worthwhile cause survives for consideration. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 10.03.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2- SHUBHAM 2026.03.11 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order