CRWP No.3783
IN TH 179 Manpreet K State of Pun CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. By w Constitution official resp of responden 2. Notic 3. On th Punjab acce 4. As pe wishes of members/re 5. Both upon their A Manpreet K 8.12.2001. 3783 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** reet Kaur and another v. Punjab and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Ms. Mamta, Advocate, for Mr. Rishu Garg, Advocate for t --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed u itution of India, petitioners are seekin al respondents no.2 and 3 to protect th pondent Nos.4 to 8. Notice of motion to respondents No. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ba accepts notice on behalf of the offici As per the petitioners, they have ma s of respondent Nos. 4 to 8, wh ers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed th their Aadhar Cards indicating that da reet Kaur is 20.3.2002 and petition 001. -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.3783 of 2026 Date of decision: 2.4.2026 Date of uploading : 2.4.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL te for the petitioners iled under Articles 226/227 of the seeking issuance of directions to the tect their life and liberty at the hands s No.1 to 3. r. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, official respondents. ve married on 30.3.2026 against the , who happen to be the family med themselves to be major relying that date of birth of petitioner No.1- etitioner No.2-Gagandeep Singh is
2026 2026 2026 f the o the ands AG, t the mily lying - is ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.04.02 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.3783
6. Witho also the me to direct res into the repr submitted b two weeks f 7. Keepi married aga respondent meeting of t their other parties may 8. Liber this order on 9. Howe other case, t taking lawfu 10. The p shall also sta 2.4.2026 Ashwanii 3783 of 2026 Without commenting on the legality he merits of contentions raised in the ect respondent No.2-Sr. Superintende he representation dated 1.4.2026 (Ann itted by the petitioners & pass approp eeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both gainst the wishes of their family ndent No.2- Sr. Superintendent of ng of the petitioners as well as the pare other concerned family members in s may endeavour to resolve their dispu Liberty is reserved in favour of privat rder on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found case, then this order shall not preclude lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. P also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
gality and validity of the marriage as in the petition, I deem it appropriate ntendent of Police, Bathinda to look (Annexure P-5) stated to have been appropriate orders thereupon within both the petitioners claim to have family(s), I direct that if possible, t of Police, Bathinda may call a he parents of both the petitioners and ers in his/her presence so that the r dispute(s) and live amicably. private respondents to seek recall of found to have been involved in any reclude the competent authority from ners. of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
ge as riate look been ithin have sible, all a s and t the all of any from any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.04.02 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document